Humana, Inc.
69 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2006–2026)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases · 7 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Humana, Inc. as an employer in 69 distinct federal employment cases between 2006 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Wrongful Termination, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in GA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Humana, Inc. appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
O'Leary v. Humana Insurance Company (2020) — Mixed Result. Over 200 clinical nurse advisors at Humana Insurance Company claimed the company improperly classified them as exempt employees, meaning they weren't paid overtime even when working extra hours. Read the ruling.
Napier v. HUMANA MARKETPOINT, INC. (2011) — Remanded. This case involved a discrimination lawsuit that employee Napier filed against Humana Marketpoint, Inc. in state court. After the lawsuit was filed, Humana tried to move the case to federal court, which companies sometimes do when they believe federal court might be more favorable to their position. Read the ruling.
Homes of Georgia, Inc. v. Humana Employers Health Plan of Georgia, Inc. (2006) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved Homes of Georgia, Inc. (HGI), which provided health plan administration services for Humana. HGI claimed that Humana wrongfully terminated their contract and committed fraud in their business dealings. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract, Wrongful Termination, Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Wrongful Termination and Discrimination.
Published opinions span Georgia (1), Texas (1), Wisconsin (1). Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Georgia rulings, Texas rulings and Wisconsin rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.