Hyatt Corporation
13 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2014–2025)
5 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Hyatt Corporation as an employer in 13 distinct federal employment cases between 2014 and 2025.
Of the 5 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, 1 settled, 1 were dismissed, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Retaliation, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Hyatt Corporation appears in 5 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Ahmadi v. Hyatt Regency Denver (2025) — Dismissed. This case involved a worker named Ahmadi who sued Hyatt Regency Denver hotel for workplace discrimination. The employee claimed they faced unfair treatment at work based on protected characteristics, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not provided in the available information. Read the ruling.
Granados v. Hyatt Corporation (2024) — Settlement. Workers at Hyatt Corporation filed a class action lawsuit claiming the company violated California labor laws. The allegations included failing to provide required meal and rest breaks, not paying minimum wage or overtime correctly, and not giving workers proper wage statements showing their earnings. Read the ruling.
Brumbach v. Hyatt Corporation (2021) — Remanded. This case involved a discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee against Hyatt Corporation in March 2021. The worker claimed they faced discrimination while working for the hotel company, though the specific details about the type of discrimination or circumstances are not available in the court records. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (2 of 5), Retaliation (2 of 5), Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Retaliation and Failure to Accommodate.
Published opinions span California (3), Colorado (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings and Colorado rulings.
These published opinions sit within the hospitality sector, where wage theft, tip-pooling violations, and sexual-harassment claims are common.
Opinion Outcomes
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Hospitality & Food Service employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.