Skip to main content
Government & Public Sector

Islamorada, Village of Islands

8 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (20042022)

8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Islamorada, Village of Islands as an employer in 8 distinct federal employment cases between 2004 and 2022.

Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 were dismissed, 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 had a mixed result.

The most common claims on record were Failure To Accommodate, Discrimination, and Retaliation.

Cases were filed across 1 state (FL).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

8
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.

1
States

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Islamorada, Village of Islands appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:

Facsina v. Islamorada, Village of Islands (2022) — Mixed Result. This case involved Anthony Facsina, who filed a disability discrimination lawsuit against his employer, the Village of Islands in Islamorada, Florida. Facsina claimed that the village government discriminated against him because of his disability, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not availa… Read the ruling.

Paul E. Bates v. Islamorada, Village of Islands (2007) — Defendant Win. Read the ruling.

The published opinions primarily involve Failure to Accommodate, Discrimination, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Failure to Accommodate, Discrimination and Retaliation.

Published opinions span Florida. Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings.

These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.

Opinion Outcomes

Dismissed
3 (38%)
Defendant Win
2 (25%)
Plaintiff Win
1 (13%)
Mixed Result
1 (13%)
Remanded
1 (13%)

Opinion Stages

8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.

Appeal
5
Motion to dismiss
3
What do these stages mean?
Appeal
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
Motion to dismiss
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.

Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.

Facing something similar? Check your rights →

Claim Types

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.