Lithia Motors, Inc.
8 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2013–2026)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Lithia Motors, Inc. is named as a defendant in 8 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2013 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Constructive Discharge.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in ID.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Lithia Motors, Inc. appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Dutton v. Lithia Idaho Falls-F, Inc. (2023) — Defendant Win. Read the ruling.
Clayborne v. Lithia Motors, Inc. (2022) — Settlement. An employee filed a wage theft lawsuit against Lithia Motors, claiming the company violated California labor laws. The case involved allegations that the company failed to provide proper wage statements and didn't allow employees adequate rest breaks—requirements under state law. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Retaliation, Constructive Discharge. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Constructive Discharge.
Published opinions span Idaho (1), California (1). Idaho is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Idaho rulings and California rulings.
These published opinions sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.