McKesson Corporation
12 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2002–2025)
8 trusted published court opinions across 7 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list McKesson Corporation as an employer in 12 distinct federal employment cases between 2002 and 2025.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 had a mixed result, and 2 ended in a ruling for the worker.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 7 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
McKesson Corporation appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Loyd v. McKesson Corporation (2025) — Mixed Result. This case involved an employee who filed a discrimination lawsuit against McKesson Corporation, a major healthcare company. The worker, Loyd, claimed the company discriminated against them in violation of employment laws, though the specific details of the alleged discrimination are not available from the court records… Read the ruling.
Mishos v. McKesson Corporation (2023) — Defendant Win. A worker filed a lawsuit against McKesson Corporation claiming she experienced discrimination, retaliation, and failure to accommodate a disability. She argued the company violated her rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which protects workers with disabilities from unfair treatment. Read the ruling.
Van Hoek v. McKesson Corporation (2019) — Mixed Result. Van Hoek filed a lawsuit against McKesson Corporation, alleging discrimination and retaliation at work. To build her case, Van Hoek's legal team requested that McKesson turn over certain documents, including financial information about the company and W-2 forms (wage records) from other employees. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (4 of 8), Retaliation (3 of 8), Failure to Accommodate (3 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Failure to Accommodate.
Published opinions span California (1), Florida (1), Ohio (1), Arizona (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Florida rulings, Ohio rulings and Arizona rulings.
These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
8 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Healthcare employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.