Midwestern Personnel Services, Inc.
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2003–2007)
4 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Midwestern Personnel Services, Inc. as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2003 and 2007.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, and Failure To Accommodate.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
About this employer
Midwestern Personnel Services, Inc. appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
National Labor Relations Board v. Midwestern Personnel Services, Inc. (2007) — Plaintiff Win. Midwestern Personnel Services fired employees who went on strike. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) investigated and found that the company illegally retaliated against these workers for participating in the strike. The NLRB ordered the company to rehire the employees and pay them for lost wages. Read the ruling.
NLRB v. Midwestern Personnel (2007) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved Midwestern Personnel Services, a staffing company that violated federal labor laws when employees went on strike. The workers had organized a strike, but the company retaliated against them by firing striking employees and interfering with their union activities. Read the ruling.
NLRB v. Midwestern Personnel (2003) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved 26 employees at Midwestern Personnel Services who went on strike. The company fired these workers and refused to give them their jobs back, claiming they had permanently replaced the strikers with new employees. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, Failure to Accommodate. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Wrongful Termination and Failure to Accommodate.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Claim Types
Related Laws
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.