Skip to main content

Mosaic

3 federal employment cases from public court records (20152019)

1 with a published ruling · 2 open dockets

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Mosaic as an employer in 3 employment matters between 2015 and 2019.

The most common claims on record were Retaliation.

Cases were filed across 1 state (IA).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

3
Federal Cases
1
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Mosaic appears in one federal employment-law court ruling on record. The case sits within the broader workplace context. Employment-law cases tracked on Workers' Rights come from CourtListener's federal-court opinion corpus and reflect rulings that produced a written decision — many disputes settle or are dismissed before reaching this stage.

The case involves a retaliation claim. Browse other retaliation rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Retaliation.

The case was filed in Iowa. Iowa is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Iowa rulings.

Claim Types

Retaliation
1 (100%)

States

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Mosaic Inc.
N.D. Ill. · Jan 2019
Open docket
Employee v. The Mosaic Company
C.D. Cal. · Aug 2017
Open docket
Employee v. Mosaic
8th Circuit · Dec 2015 · Iowa · Retaliation
Defendant Win
Showing 3 of 3

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.