Nassau County
5 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2004–2020)
6 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Nassau County as an employer in 5 distinct federal employment cases between 2004 and 2020.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 were dismissed, and 1 had a mixed result.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Nassau County appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Knight v. Nassau County (2020) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute between an employee named Knight and Nassau County, their employer. The case included claims related to civil rights and employment issues, suggesting Knight believed the county violated their workplace rights in some way. Read the ruling.
Knight v. Nassau County (2019) — Defendant Win. A probation officer working for Nassau County was fired after being involved in misconduct during a traffic stop and having a confrontation with a coworker. The officer then sued, claiming the county fired him as retaliation for exercising his free speech rights and for other legal violations. Read the ruling.
Solomon v. Nassau County (2011) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employee who sued Nassau County, claiming the employer failed to properly accommodate their disability and acted negligently. The worker likely faced workplace barriers and believed the county didn't meet its legal obligations to provide reasonable accommodations or maintain a safe work environmen… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (4 of 6), Discrimination (3 of 6), Wrongful Termination (2 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Discrimination and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.
These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 4 summary-judgment opinions, 3 ended the case in Nassau County’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.