Nassau Health Care Corporation
6 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2014–2023)
1 trusted published court opinion across 1 distinct case · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Nassau Health Care Corporation is named as a defendant in 6 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2014 and 2023.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 1 distinct case.
About this employer
Nassau Health Care Corporation appears in one trusted published federal employment opinion:
Civil Serv. Employees Assn., A.F.S.C.M.E. Local 1000, A.F.L.-C.I.O. by its Local 830 v. Nassau Healthcare Corp. (2020) — Defendant Win. Three healthcare workers at Nassau Healthcare Corporation were fired and filed a grievance through their union. An arbitrator (a neutral decision-maker) ruled that the workers should be reinstated to their jobs. Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a wrongful termination claim. Browse other wrongful termination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wrongful Termination.
This published opinion sits within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
3 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.