Skip to main content
Healthcare

New York Presbyterian Hospital

7 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (20102024)

2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases

What public court records show

Public federal court records list New York Presbyterian Hospital as an employer in 7 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2024.

The most common claims on record were Discrimination.

Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

2
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.

1
States

Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

New York Presbyterian Hospital appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. The most recent written decision on record:

Montgomery v. New York Presbyterian Hospital (2024) — Dismissed. A worker filed an employment discrimination complaint against New York Presbyterian Hospital. The hospital asked the court to throw out the case, arguing that the worker's complaint didn't provide enough details to support a discrimination claim. Read the ruling.

The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Unfair Labor Practice. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination and Unfair Labor Practice.

Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.

These published opinions sit within the healthcare sector, where employment disputes commonly involve HIPAA-adjacent retaliation, nursing-license issues, and accommodations under the ADA.

Claim Types

States

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. New York Presbyterian Hospital
S.D.N.Y. · Sep 2024 · New York · Discrimination
Dismissed
Employee v. New York Presbyterian Hospital
S.D.N.Y. · May 2017
Docket closed
Employee v. New York Presbyterian Hospital
S.D.N.Y. · Jan 2016
Docket closed
Employee v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital
S.D.N.Y. · Jun 2015
Docket closed
Employee v. New York Presbyterian Hospital
S.D.N.Y. · Aug 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. Circuit · Jun 2011 · Unfair Labor Practice
Mixed Result
Employee v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital
S.D.N.Y. · Jul 2010
Docket closed
Showing 7 of 7

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.