Nike Retail Services, Inc.
24 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2011–2025)
6 trusted published court opinions across 5 distinct cases · 8 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Nike Retail Services, Inc. as an employer in 24 distinct federal employment cases between 2011 and 2025.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 2 had a mixed result, 2 were sent back to a lower court, 1 ended in a ruling for the employer, and 1 settled.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Discrimination, and Harassment.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 5 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Nike Retail Services, Inc. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Breanna Tolston v. Nike USA, Inc. (2025) — Remanded. Breanna Tolston filed a lawsuit against Nike USA, Inc., claiming she faced discrimination, harassment, and retaliation at work. She also alleged she was fired wrongfully and faced retaliation for whistleblowing (reporting illegal activity). Read the ruling.
Cruz v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. (2024) — Mixed Result. This case involved an employment dispute between a worker named Cruz and Nike Retail Services, Inc. However, the available court records don't provide enough details to explain what specific workplace issue led to the lawsuit or what employment laws were allegedly violated. Read the ruling.
Cruz v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. (2023) — Mixed Result. An employment law case was filed against Nike Retail Services, Inc. in December 2023 by a worker named Cruz. However, the available court records don't provide enough information to explain what specific workplace issue or dispute led to this lawsuit. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (3 of 6), Discrimination (2 of 6), Harassment. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Discrimination and Harassment.
Published opinions span California (5), Oregon (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings and Oregon rulings.
These published opinions sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Retail employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.