OS Restaurant Services, LLC
83 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (1999–2026)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 7 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, OS Restaurant Services, LLC is named as a defendant in 83 federal cases coded as employment matters between 1999 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in NJ.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
OS Restaurant Services, LLC appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
WHITNEY v. BLOOMIN BRANDS, INC. (2021) — Dismissed. Whitney filed a lawsuit against Bloomin Brands, Inc., claiming wrongful termination, discrimination, failure to accommodate disabilities, retaliation, and a hostile work environment. Read the ruling.
Comm'n v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. (1999) — Plaintiff Win. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a case against Outback Steakhouse of Florida in 1999, alleging the restaurant chain engaged in discriminatory employment practices. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Wrongful Termination and Discrimination.
Published opinions span New Jersey (1), Ohio (1). New Jersey is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New Jersey rulings and Ohio rulings.
These published opinions sit within the hospitality sector, where wage theft, tip-pooling violations, and sexual-harassment claims are common.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.