PELMOR LABORATORIES INC.
4 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2014–2018)
2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list PELMOR LABORATORIES INC. as an employer in 4 distinct federal employment cases between 2014 and 2018.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wage Theft, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 1 state (PA).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
PELMOR LABORATORIES INC. appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Debra Steele v. Pelmor Laboratories Inc (2018) — Defendant Win. This case involved Debra Steele, who brought an employment-related legal claim against her employer, Pelmor Laboratories Inc. The dispute was filed in federal court and heard by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in March 2018. Read the ruling.
Debra Steele v. Pelmor Laboratories Inc (2016) — Defendant Win. Debra Steele filed a lawsuit against her former employer, Pelmor Laboratories Inc., claiming the company violated employment laws. The specific details of her complaints were not provided in the available case information, but the dispute involved workplace-related legal issues that Steele believed warranted court acti… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Wage Theft, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wage Theft and Retaliation.
Published opinions span Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Pennsylvania rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.