Rock-Tenn Company
12 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2004–2015)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Rock-Tenn Company as an employer in 12 distinct federal employment cases between 2004 and 2015.
The most common claims on record were Harassment, Hostile Work Environment, and Constructive Discharge.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in AR.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Rock-Tenn Company appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rock-Tenn Services Co. (2012) — Mixed Result. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Rock-Tenn Services Company over claims that workers faced discrimination and harassment that created a hostile work environment. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rock Tenn Co. (2011) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved sexual harassment claims against Rock Tenn Company. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued the company on behalf of workers who allegedly faced harassment from an employee named Steve Birch. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Harassment, Hostile Work Environment, Constructive Discharge. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Harassment, Hostile Work Environment and Constructive Discharge.
Published opinions span Arkansas (1), Texas (1). Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Arkansas rulings and Texas rulings.
These published opinions sit within the manufacturing sector, where OSHA whistleblower, FMLA, and disability-accommodation claims are most common.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Manufacturing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.