Skip to main content
Legal Services

Rose

5 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (20042025)

2 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 1 docket-only case without a recorded end date

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Rose as an employer in 5 distinct federal employment cases between 2004 and 2025.

The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination.

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

2
Published Opinions Analyzed

Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Rose appears in 2 trusted published federal employment opinions. The most recent written decision on record:

Rose Corp. v. WCAB (Espada) (2020) — Defendant Win. This case involved Rose Corp. challenging a workers' compensation decision made by Pennsylvania's Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) regarding an employee named Espada. Read the ruling.

The published opinion involves a wrongful termination claim. Browse other wrongful termination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wrongful Termination.

These published opinions sit within the legal sector, where partnership-track discrimination and bar-related retaliation claims raise unique issues.

Claim Types

What these numbers mean

A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.

A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.

Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.

Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.

Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.

Federal court cases

public court records

One row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted

Employee v. Rose International, Inc.
N.D. Ga. · Jun 2025
Rose Corp. v. Employee
Pa. Commw. Ct. · Aug 2020 · Wrongful Termination
Defendant Win
Employee v. THE ROSE GROUP
E.D. Pa. · Oct 2018
Docket closed
Employee v. THE ROSE GROUP
E.D. Pa. · Apr 2013
Docket closed
Employee v. Rose
Md. · Oct 2004
Defendant Win
Showing 5 of 5

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.