Sam's West, Inc.
31 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2025)
6 trusted published court opinions across 6 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Sam's West, Inc. as an employer in 31 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2025.
Of the 6 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 were sent back to a lower court, 2 were dismissed, and 1 ended in a ruling for the employer.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Wrongful Termination.
Cases were filed across 5 states, most often in FL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Sam's West, Inc. appears in 6 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Maria Garcia v. Sam's West, Inc. (2025) — Remanded. Maria Garcia filed a discrimination lawsuit against Sam's West, Inc. The company tried to move the case from state court to federal court, claiming it had the right to do so. Read the ruling.
Ali v. Sam's West Inc (2022) — Dismissed. Ali sued Sam's West Inc., claiming discrimination, retaliation, a hostile work environment, and wage theft. These are serious allegations that many workers face on the job. Read the ruling.
Khoshneviszadeh v. Sams West, Inc. (2022) — Remanded. An employee filed a lawsuit against Sam's West, Inc. and an individual named Kevin Cokeley, claiming discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and wrongful termination. The employer tried to move the case to federal court, arguing that one defendant was improperly included in the lawsuit just to keep it in state court. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 6), Retaliation (3 of 6), Wrongful Termination (2 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Wrongful Termination.
Published opinions span Florida (2), Colorado (1), California (1), Nevada (1). Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings, Colorado rulings, California rulings and Nevada rulings.
These published opinions sit within the retail sector, where wage-and-hour, scheduling, and Title VII harassment claims are the dominant categories.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Retail employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.