Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
18 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2007–2026)
3 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases · 2 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Schneider National Carriers, Inc. is named as a defendant in 18 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2007 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 1 state (MO).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Benford v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. (2021) — Defendant Win. A former employee at Schneider National Carriers, Inc. filed a lawsuit claiming he was fired because of his religious beliefs. The employee believed his employer treated him unfairly based on his religion, which is illegal under federal law. Read the ruling.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Schneider National, Inc. (2007) — Defendant Win. This case involved a truck driver who was fired by Schneider National after being diagnosed with neurocardiogenic syncope, a condition that can cause fainting spells. Read the ruling.
EEOC v. Schneider Nat'l Inc (2007) — Defendant Win. An employee named Hoefner worked as a truck driver for Schneider National, a trucking company. Hoefner had a medical condition called neurocardiogenic syncope, which can cause fainting spells. Schneider fired Hoefner because of this condition, believing it made driving unsafe. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate, Religious Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Religious Discrimination.
Published opinions span Missouri. Missouri is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Missouri rulings.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
1 published opinion names this party but is not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.