Standard Drywall, Inc.
4 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2013)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Standard Drywall, Inc. as an employer in 4 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2013.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination and Wage Theft.
Cases were filed across 1 state (CA).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Standard Drywall, Inc. appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board (2013) — Defendant Win. Two unions—the Plasterers and the Carpenters—disagreed over which organization had the right to represent workers at Standard Drywall, Inc. The Plasterers union tried to enforce an arbitration award (a binding decision from a private dispute process) to gain representation rights. Read the ruling.
Standard Drywall, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2013) — Defendant Win. Standard Drywall, Inc. faced charges involving violations of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which protects workers' rights to organize, join unions, and engage in collective bargaining. The case involved labor relations and employment practices at the company. Read the ruling.
Small ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n Local 200 (2010) — Defendant Win. This case involved a dispute between a cement masons' union (Local 200) and Standard Drywall, Inc. The National Labor Relations Board accused the union of filing lawsuits in state court against the contractor for an improper purpose. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination, Wage Theft. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination and Wage Theft.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span California. California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.