Skip to main content

Sterling, South Carolina Department of Social Services Child Support Enforcement Division

1 federal employment case from public court records (20252025)

1 with a published ruling

What public court records show

Public federal court records list Sterling, South Carolina Department of Social Services Child Support Enforcement Division as an employer in 1 employment matter since 2025.

Cases were filed across 1 state (OH).

These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.

1
Federal Cases
1
States
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

About this employer

Sterling, South Carolina Department of Social Services Child Support Enforcement Division appears in one federal employment-law court ruling on record. The case sits within the broader workplace context. Employment-law cases tracked on Workers' Rights come from CourtListener's federal-court opinion corpus and reflect rulings that produced a written decision — many disputes settle or are dismissed before reaching this stage.

The case involves a discrimination claim. Browse other discrimination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Discrimination.

The case was filed in Ohio. Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Ohio rulings.

States

Federal cases

public court records

One row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted

Showing 1 of 1

Understand your employment rights

Free, private, no sign-up required.

Check My Rights

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.