Suffolk County Police Department
6 federal employment cases from public court records (1997–2025)
6 with a published ruling
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Suffolk County Police Department as an employer in 6 employment matters between 1997 and 2025.
Of the 6 matters with a recorded outcome, the most common were: 3 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 ended in a ruling for the employer, and 1 were sent back to a lower court.
Workers obtained a favorable ruling in about 50% of matters with a recorded outcome.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, and Failure To Accommodate.
Cases were filed across 2 states, most often in NY.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
About this employer
Suffolk County Police Department appears in 6 federal employment-law court rulings on record. These cases sit within the broader workplace context. The set below covers rulings that produced written federal-court decisions; private settlements, EEOC charges resolved without litigation, and state-court cases are not included.
The cases primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 6), Wrongful Termination (3 of 6), Failure to Accommodate (2 of 6). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wrongful Termination and Failure to Accommodate.
Rulings span New York (5), Michigan (1). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings and Michigan rulings.
Case Outcomes
Case Stages
The stage at which courts issued Suffolk County Police Department’s 6 stage-identified rulings.
Of the 4 summary-judgment rulings, 2 ended the case in Suffolk County Police Department’s favor and 2 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with court rulings
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.