Sysco Atlanta, LLC
46 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2001–2025)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases · 3 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Sysco Atlanta, LLC as an employer in 46 distinct federal employment cases between 2001 and 2025.
The most common claims on record were Workers Compensation, Discrimination, and Hostile Work Environment.
Cases were filed across 1 state (NY).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Sysco Atlanta, LLC appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Sysco Grand Rapids, LLC v. NLRB (2020) — Mixed Result. This case involved Sysco Grand Rapids, a food distribution company, and disputes over how the company treated workers who were trying to organize a union. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that Sysco had engaged in unfair labor practices, including firing workers and reducing their hours in retaliation fo… Read the ruling.
Adams v. Sysco Food Service of New Orleans (2008) — Plaintiff Win. Adams, a worker at Sysco Food Service of New Orleans, developed carpal tunnel syndrome that he believed was caused by his job duties. He filed a workers' compensation claim to get medical coverage and benefits for his condition. Read the ruling.
Russo v. SYSCO Food Services of Albany, L.L.C. (2007) — Mixed Result. This case involved an employee who sued SYSCO Food Services, claiming the company discriminated against him based on his disability and age, and failed to provide reasonable accommodations for his medical condition. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Workers’ Compensation, Discrimination, Hostile Work Environment. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Workers’ Compensation, Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment.
Published opinions span New York. New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings.
These published opinions sit within the broader workplace context.
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Food Processing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.