T-Mobile USA, Inc.
98 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2010–2026)
9 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases · 15 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list T-Mobile USA, Inc. as an employer in 98 distinct federal employment cases between 2010 and 2026.
Of the 9 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, 1 were dismissed, and 1 had a mixed result.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Discrimination, and Wage Theft.
Cases were filed across 5 states, most often in CA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
T-Mobile USA, Inc. appears in 9 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Zajonc v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (2025) — Defendant Win. An employee filed a lawsuit against T-Mobile, claiming the company discriminated against her based on her religious beliefs. Specifically, she objected to the employer's vaccine requirement on religious grounds and alleged the company violated state anti-discrimination laws. Read the ruling.
Gomez v. T-Mobile USA Inc (2025) — Defendant Win. This case involved a worker named Gomez who sued T-Mobile USA Inc for wage theft. Gomez claimed that T-Mobile failed to pay wages that were legally owed, which could include unpaid overtime, missed breaks, or other compensation violations. Read the ruling.
Zajonc v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (2025) — Dismissed. A worker named Zajonc filed an employment law case against T-Mobile US, Inc. in federal court. The specific details about what workplace issue sparked this dispute are not available in the court records provided, but it involved some type of employment-related conflict between the employee and the telecommunications co… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (4 of 9), Discrimination (4 of 9). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation and Discrimination.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
Published opinions span California (2), Kansas (1), New Mexico (1), Washington (1). California is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. California rulings, Kansas rulings, New Mexico rulings and Washington rulings.
These published opinions sit within the technology sector, where age-discrimination, non-compete, and whistleblower-retaliation claims appear frequently.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
9 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 2 ended the case in T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Technology employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.