The Anthem Companies, Inc.
90 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2010–2026)
8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases · 17 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, The Anthem Companies, Inc. is named as a party in 90 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2010 and 2026.
Of the 7 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 4 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 had a mixed result, and 1 was dismissed.
1 further opinion is listed below but left out of these outcome figures, because the employer brought the case or was not a party to it.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wage Theft, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 7 states, most often in WA.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
The Anthem Companies, Inc. appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Cammon v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (2025) — Dismissed. An employee, Cammon, filed a lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan claiming discrimination, retaliation, and harassment at work. After an initial court decision went against Cammon, he asked the court to reconsider its ruling. Read the ruling.
Healy v. The Elevance Health Companies Inc (2025) — Defendant Win. An employee named Healy sued Elevance Health, claiming he was discriminated against based on his age. He also alleged emotional distress, wage theft, and improper conversion of his property. Healy argued his termination was wrongful. Read the ruling.
Lazaar v. The Anthem Companies, Inc. (2023) — Mixed Result. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (3 of 8), Wage Theft (3 of 8), Retaliation (3 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wage Theft and Retaliation.
Published opinions span Washington (1), Michigan (1), Missouri (1), Arizona (1). Washington is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Washington rulings, Michigan rulings, Missouri rulings and Arizona rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
1 listed opinion is not counted here: the employer brought the case, or was not a party to an appeal against an agency, so the recorded outcome is not a result for or against a worker.
Opinion Stages
7 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 2 ended the case in The Anthem Companies, Inc.’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
1 published opinion names this party but is not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.