TNT Logistics of North America, Inc.
7 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2000–2012)
7 trusted published court opinions across 6 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list TNT Logistics of North America, Inc. as an employer in 7 distinct federal employment cases between 2000 and 2012.
Of the 7 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 had a mixed result, and 2 were sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Retaliation, Whistleblower, and Breach Of Contract.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
About this employer
TNT Logistics of North America, Inc. appears in 7 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Jolliff v. National Labor Relations Board (2008) — Remanded. This case involved employees at TNT Logistics of North America who faced retaliation after raising concerns about workplace issues. The workers claimed their employer punished them for speaking out, which they believed violated their rights under federal labor law. Read the ruling.
Joliff v. NLRB (2008) — Remanded. This case involved employees at TNT Logistics of North America who faced retaliation after engaging in protected workplace activities. The workers believed they were punished by their employer for exercising rights that should have been legally protected under federal labor law. Read the ruling.
TNT Logistics of North America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2005) — Mixed Result. An employee at TNT Logistics faced discipline and termination after engaging in union activities. The company told the worker that unions were forbidden because of a contract with Home Depot. The employee challenged this, arguing that TNT was retaliating against union support in violation of federal labor law. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Retaliation (3 of 7), Whistleblower (2 of 7), Breach of Contract. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Retaliation, Whistleblower and Breach of Contract.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: NLRA (29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169) — The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees to organize, form or join labor unions, bargain collectively through representatives of their choosing, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection. See the NLRA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. NLRA.
These published opinions sit within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
7 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 0 ended the case in TNT Logistics of North America, Inc.’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
Related Laws
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.