Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.
19 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2009–2024)
3 trusted published court opinions across 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. as an employer in 19 distinct federal employment cases between 2009 and 2024.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Failure To Accommodate, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 3 states, most often in IL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Adzogble v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (2023) — Defendant Win. An employee at Tyson Fresh Meats claimed the company discriminated against him based on his disability. He also alleged the company failed to accommodate his disability and retaliated against him. Read the ruling.
Holmquist v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (2020) — Defendant Win. An employee filed a lawsuit against Tyson Fresh Meats claiming the company discriminated against them based on disability, refused to make proper workplace accommodations, and retaliated against them for complaining about these issues. Read the ruling.
Goodell v. TYSON FRESH MEATS (2009) — Plaintiff Win. Nicole Goodell, an employee at Tyson Fresh Meats, suffered a work-related injury to her left foot while on the job. As a result of compensating for this foot injury, she later developed a lower back injury. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Failure to Accommodate and Retaliation.
Published opinions span Illinois (1), Nebraska (1), Kansas (1). Illinois is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Illinois rulings, Nebraska rulings and Kansas rulings.
These published opinions sit within the broader workplace context.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Food Processing employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.