U.S. Postal Service
12 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2000–2017)
10 trusted published court opinions across 10 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list U.S. Postal Service as an employer in 12 distinct federal employment cases between 2000 and 2017.
Of the 10 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 8 ended in a ruling for the employer, 1 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 were dismissed.
Plaintiffs won 1 of 10 adjudicated opinions (10%).
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Retaliation, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 4 states, most often in FL.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 10 distinct cases.
1 of 10 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
U.S. Postal Service appears in 10 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Arleatha Wilson v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm. (2016) — Defendant Win. Arleatha Wilson worked for the U.S. Postal Service and later applied for unemployment benefits in Florida. The state's Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission denied her claim for these benefits. Read the ruling.
Bond v. U.S. Postal Service Federal Credit Union (2015) — Defendant Win. This case involved a workplace dispute between an employee named Bond and the U.S. Postal Service Federal Credit Union. While the court documents don't provide specific details about what sparked the conflict, Bond filed an employment-related lawsuit against their employer in 2015. Read the ruling.
National Labor Relations Board v. U.S. Postal Service (2008) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a U.S. Postal Service employee who filed a complaint with their union about workplace issues. After the employee made this union-related complaint, their supervisor, Bobby Powers, threatened the worker with retaliation for taking this action. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination (3 of 10), Retaliation (2 of 10), Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Retaliation and Discrimination.
Published opinions span Florida (2), Virginia (1), Mississippi (1), Maryland (1). Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings, Virginia rulings, Mississippi rulings and Maryland rulings.
These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
10 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in U.S. Postal Service’s favor and 0 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.