Waste Pro USA, Inc.
130 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2011–2026)
10 trusted published court opinions across 9 distinct cases · 7 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Waste Pro USA, Inc. as an employer in 130 distinct federal employment cases between 2011 and 2026.
Of the 10 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 5 settled, 4 ended in a ruling for the worker, and 1 ended in a ruling for the employer.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft.
Cases were filed across 1 state (FL).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 9 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Waste Pro USA, Inc. appears in 10 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Dondero v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. (2023) — Settlement. Angela Dondero filed a lawsuit against Waste Pro of Florida, Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage laws by not paying her wages correctly. This type of claim falls under federal labor standards that protect workers' pay. Read the ruling.
Rivera v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. (2023) — Plaintiff Win. Rivera, an employee at Waste Pro of Florida, Inc., filed a lawsuit claiming his employer failed to pay him proper wages in violation of federal wage laws. This type of claim—known as wage theft—occurs when employers don't compensate workers for hours worked or violate minimum wage requirements. Read the ruling.
Curry v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. (2022) — Plaintiff Win. An employee named Curry sued Waste Pro of Florida, Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws by not properly paying workers for their time worked. This type of case is called wage theft. Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a wage theft claim. Browse other wage theft rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Wage Theft.
Published opinions span Florida. Florida is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Florida rulings.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
9 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 1 summary-judgment opinions, 0 ended the case in Waste Pro USA, Inc.’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.