XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
70 federal employment cases from public court records (2015–2026)
1 with a published ruling · 69 open dockets
What public court records show
Public federal court records list XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. as an employer in 70 employment matters between 2015 and 2026.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Retaliation, and Hostile Work Environment.
Cases were filed across 1 state (KS).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
About this employer
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. appears in one federal employment-law court ruling on record. The case sits within the transportation sector, where USERRA, FMLA, and DOT safety-retaliation claims appear alongside standard discrimination claims. Employment-law cases tracked on Workers' Rights come from CourtListener's federal-court opinion corpus and reflect rulings that produced a written decision — many disputes settle or are dismissed before reaching this stage.
The cases primarily involve Discrimination, Retaliation, Hostile Work Environment. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Retaliation and Hostile Work Environment.
The case was filed in Kansas. Kansas is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Kansas rulings.
Claim Types
States
Federal cases
public court recordsOne row per case · a badge means the case reached a published ruling · plaintiff names redacted
Other Transportation & Logistics employers
Browse rulings involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.