Griffin v. Absolute Fire Control, Inc.
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- North Carolina
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals decision, which had affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part the Industrial Commission's award. The Supreme Court dismissed plaintiff's petition for discretionary review and the defendant's conditional petition as improvidently allowed.
Excerpt
Whether the Court of Appeals employed the proper standard of review whether plaintiff established disability whether plaintiff was capable of suitable employment.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Griffin from the same court.
Similar Rulings
workers compensation disability and suitability of substitute employment makework
workers compensation disability and suitability of substitute employment makework
Whether a unilateral amendment made pursuant to a change-of-terms provision violates the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and renders a contract illusory.
Whether the Industrial Commission's calculation of the plaintiff's average weekly wages pursuant to N.C.G.S. 97-2(5) and its determination concerning whether that calculation produces results that are fair and just to both parties involve an issue of law or an issue of fact.
Whether State employees are entitled to sovereign immunity against claims of negligence, gross negligence, and wrongful death brought against them in their individual capacities, and whether complaint stated cause of action.
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.