Skip to main content

Kissee v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union

4th CircuitAugust 19, 2002No. 02-1632
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Niemeyer, Luttig, Williams
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on the plaintiff's employment discrimination claim under Title VII, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Kissee v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union: Employment Discrimination Case** **What Happened** An employee named Kissee filed a discrimination lawsuit against the United Food & Commercial Workers Union, claiming the union violated federal employment discrimination laws (Title VII). The specific details of the alleged discrimination weren't provided in the available information, but Kissee believed the union treated them unfairly based on a protected characteristic like race, gender, or religion. **What the Court Decided** The courts ruled against Kissee at two levels. First, a lower district court denied Kissee's request for relief, meaning they rejected the discrimination claim. Kissee appealed this decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2002. However, the appeals court upheld the lower court's decision, finding no legal errors in how the case was handled. This meant Kissee received no financial compensation or other remedies. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case demonstrates that winning employment discrimination lawsuits can be challenging, even against labor unions that typically advocate for workers' rights. It shows that both the initial court and appeals court must find sufficient evidence to support discrimination claims. Workers considering similar legal action should understand that strong documentation and evidence are crucial for successful discrimination cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.