Skip to main content

Cesar Acevedo v. Plaza Liquors, Inc.

C.D. Cal.October 15, 2024No. 2:24-cv-08250
Plaintiff WinKilolo Kijakazi$10,322.78 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiff Natalie D. prevailed in her Social Security disability benefits appeal and was awarded attorney fees of $10,322.78 under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The court rejected the Commissioner's request to reduce the fee award.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** This case involves Natalie D., who appealed a denial of her Social Security disability benefits. When people apply for disability benefits and get turned down, they can challenge that decision in federal court. Natalie did exactly that - she disagreed with the Social Security Administration's decision to deny her benefits and took her case to court. **What the court decided:** Natalie won her appeal, meaning the court agreed that she should receive disability benefits. Additionally, under a federal law called the Equal Access to Justice Act, she was awarded $10,322.78 to cover her attorney fees. The Social Security Administration tried to get the court to reduce this fee payment, but the judge refused and ordered the full amount to be paid. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling demonstrates that workers have real options when fighting government benefit denials. The Equal Access to Justice Act helps level the playing field by ensuring that people who successfully challenge wrongful government decisions can recover their legal costs. This makes it more feasible for workers to hire attorneys and fight for benefits they're entitled to, knowing they won't be stuck with large legal bills if they win their case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.