Skip to main content

Perrot v. Kelly

D. Mass.October 28, 2024No. 1:18-cv-10147
Plaintiff WinSports Page Bar, LLLP$13,626 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Default judgment entered in favor of Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. against Sports Page Bar and Michelle Youngblood for unauthorized broadcast of UFC events. Plaintiff awarded $3,626.00 in statutory damages and $10,000.00 in enhanced damages for willful violation.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved Joe Hand Promotions suing Sports Page Bar and its owner Michelle Youngblood for illegally broadcasting UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship) events without paying the required licensing fees. When businesses like bars and restaurants want to show pay-per-view sporting events to customers, they must pay special commercial licensing fees that are much higher than what home viewers pay. Sports Page Bar apparently showed these UFC events without obtaining or paying for the proper commercial broadcast license. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of Joe Hand Promotions through a default judgment, meaning Sports Page Bar failed to properly respond to the lawsuit. The bar was ordered to pay $13,626 in total damages - $3,626 in basic statutory damages plus an additional $10,000 in enhanced damages because the court found the violation was willful (intentional). **Why This Matters for Workers** While this case primarily involves business licensing rather than employment law, it shows how businesses that cut corners on legal requirements can face serious financial consequences. Workers should be aware that employers who ignore licensing laws or other legal obligations may also be more likely to violate employment laws, potentially putting jobs and workplace protections at risk.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.