Crowder Hitz v. Symetra Life Insurance Company
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Louisiana
- Circuit
- Eighth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
UPS prevailed on summary judgment. The court granted UPS's motion, finding that Green failed to establish a prima facie case under the ADA because his vision impairment did not substantially limit major life activities compared to the general population, and that even if he qualified as disabled, UPS's refusal to accommodate was not based on disability but on legitimate business reasons (CBA conflict and operational burden).
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.