Skip to main content

Fowler v. Medicine Man Technologies, Inc.

D.N.M.July 22, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00640
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted the defendant insurance company's motion for partial summary judgment, limiting the plaintiff's breach of contract claim to costs incurred during the bond's one-year term (January 21, 2021 to January 20, 2022) and capping liability at the bond's penal sum of $599,400.

What This Ruling Means

**Fowler v. Medicine Man Technologies: Insurance Bond Dispute** This case involved a dispute over an insurance bond between Fowler and Aspen American Insurance Company. The disagreement centered on how much money could be claimed under a breach of contract and what time period those claims could cover. The court sided with the insurance company by granting their request to limit the case. The judge ruled that any money Fowler could recover was restricted to costs that occurred during the bond's one-year period from January 21, 2021, to January 20, 2022. Additionally, the court capped the maximum amount Fowler could receive at $599,400, which was the bond's penalty limit. This ruling matters for workers because it shows how courts interpret insurance bonds and contract terms. When workers are involved in disputes over insurance coverage or bonded agreements, they should understand that courts will typically enforce the specific time limits and dollar amounts written in those contracts. Workers should carefully review any insurance or bond documents they encounter in employment situations to understand what protections are actually available and for how long those protections last.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.