Skip to main content

Mattern v. PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP

E.D.N.Y.August 26, 2024No. 2:23-cv-07281
Mixed ResultPKF O'Connor Davies, LLP
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
751 Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationWrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss in part and denied in part. FMLA interference and retaliation claims, disability discrimination claims under ADA/NYSHRL/NYCHRL, and retaliation claims under NYSHRL survived; breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims were dismissed.

What This Ruling Means

Mattern v. PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP

What Happened

An employee filed a lawsuit against accounting firm PKF O'Connor Davies claiming the company treated them unfairly based on disability, punished them for taking legally protected leave, and wrongfully terminated their employment. The employee also alleged the company broke an employment contract and violated payment agreements.

What the Court Decided

The court partially sided with both parties. It dismissed the contract and payment claims, meaning those arguments won't proceed to trial. However, the court allowed the following claims to move forward: that the company interfered with the employee's right to take family medical leave, retaliated against them for taking that leave, discriminated against them because of disability, and retaliated for asserting their legal rights.

Why This Matters for Workers

This ruling reinforces that workers have strong legal protections when taking disability-related leave or family medical leave. Employers cannot punish employees for using these rights. While the employee didn't win the entire case, the court recognized that these claims have enough merit to proceed, showing courts take workplace retaliation and disability discrimination seriously.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.