No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff prevailed on default judgment for wage and hour violations under NYLL, recovering unpaid minimum wages, overtime wages, statutory penalties for failure to provide wage notices and statements, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs totaling approximately $139,468.50 plus interest and penalties.
Castillo v. Hollis Deli & Grill Corp.
What Happened
A worker named Castillo sued Hollis Delicatessen Corp. and Hollis Deli & Grill Corp. for wage theft—specifically, the employer failed to pay minimum wage and overtime pay that were legally required. The employer also did not provide proper written wage notices and pay statements to the employee, as required by New York law.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in favor of Castillo. The employer lost the case by default, meaning they did not adequately respond to the lawsuit. The court ordered the company to pay approximately $139,468.50 in damages. This included unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime, penalties for withholding wage information, extra damages, attorney fees, and court costs, plus additional interest and penalties.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers must pay workers all earned wages and overtime. Employers must also provide clear written records of pay. Workers who face wage theft have legal options and can recover substantial compensation, including attorney fees, which makes it possible to afford legal help.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Castillo from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.