Skip to main content

Finkel v. Firequench, Inc.

E.D.N.Y.September 20, 2024No. 1:23-cv-04868
Plaintiff WinFirequench, Inc.$40,581.07 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to confirm arbitration

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court confirmed an arbitration award in favor of Dr. Finkel under a collective bargaining agreement, ordering Firequench to pay a total of $40,581.07 in unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, legal fees, and costs, plus post-judgment interest and additional attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

Finkel v. Firequench, Inc. — Court Summary

What Happened

Dr. Finkel worked for Firequench, Inc. and believed the company failed to pay required contributions on his behalf under his union contract. He filed a wage theft complaint, arguing that Firequench owed him money for these unpaid benefits.

What the Court Decided

The court agreed with Dr. Finkel and upheld an earlier arbitration decision. Firequench must pay him $40,581.07. This amount includes his unpaid contributions, interest charges, liquidated damages (extra money as punishment), and legal fees. The company must also pay additional attorney's fees and interest that continues to accumulate after the judgment.

Why This Matters

This case reinforces that employers cannot ignore union contract obligations without facing serious consequences. Workers covered by collective bargaining agreements have legal protections requiring employers to make contractual payments. When companies fail to do so, courts will enforce payment—often including penalty fees and legal costs on top of the original amount owed. This ruling shows workers have recourse when employers attempt wage theft.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.