Beadle v. Forever Jerk LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff Beadle obtained a default judgment against Forever Jerk LLC and Oneil Reid for unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, receiving $38,205.12 in damages plus $14,102.56 in pre-judgment interest, attorney's fees of $13,575, and costs of $584.
What This Ruling Means
Beadle v. Forever Jerk LLC: Court Rules in Favor of Worker Over Wage Theft
What Happened
Beadle filed a lawsuit against Forever Jerk LLC and its owner, Oneil Reid, claiming the company failed to pay wages owed to him. The employer did not respond to the court case.
What the Court Decided
A federal judge in New York ruled in Beadle's favor by default judgment. The court ordered Forever Jerk LLC to pay Beadle $38,205.12 in unpaid wages. Additionally, the company must pay $14,102.56 in interest that accumulated while the wages were overdue, $13,575 in attorney's fees, and $584 in court costs. The total judgment exceeded $66,000.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that workers have legal protection against wage theft. When employers fail to pay earned wages, workers can take legal action under federal wage laws. Courts can award not just the missing wages, but also interest, legal fees, and costs. This ruling shows that employers who ignore court cases may face even larger judgments, making it financially risky to withhold employee pay.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.