No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff Daniel Zak prevailed on his New York Labor Law claim for unpaid wages. The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation awarding $15,750 in damages for unpaid wages, $15,750 in liquidated damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, $28,511.30 in attorneys' fees, and $889.53 in costs. The FLSA claim was dismissed with prejudice as it fell outside the FLSA's minimum wage and overtime provisions.
Zak v. Five Tier, Inc. — Plain English Summary
What Happened
Daniel Zak worked for Five Tier, Inc. and sued the company for not paying him wages owed, wrongfully firing him, and breaking an employment contract. Zak sought compensation for these violations.
What the Court Decided
A federal judge in New York ruled in Zak's favor. The court found that Five Tier, Inc. failed to pay Zak earned wages. The company was ordered to pay $15,750 in unpaid wages plus an additional $15,750 in penalty damages designed to punish the violation. The court also awarded Zak $28,511.30 to cover his legal fees and $889.53 in case costs. His total recovery came to $61,400.83. However, the judge dismissed Zak's federal minimum wage claim because it didn't qualify under federal law.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that courts take wage theft seriously. When employers fail to pay workers what they've earned, they face significant financial penalties beyond simply repaying the wages. Additionally, workers who win these cases can recover attorney's fees, making it more affordable to pursue legal action against employers who withhold pay.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Zak from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.