Roesel v. DAM Management LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Ohio
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court granted plaintiffs' partial summary judgment motion on Fair Labor Standards Act and Ohio minimum wage violations, finding that defendant improperly withheld credit card processing fees from servers' tips, thereby forfeiting the tip credit and owing minimum wage.
What This Ruling Means
Roesel v. DAM Management LLC Summary
What Happened
Restaurant servers at DAM Management, LLC sued their employer over how tips were handled. The company was deducting credit card processing fees directly from the servers' tips—essentially taking a cut of money that customers intended for their employees.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in favor of the servers. The judge found that DAM Management violated federal and Ohio wage laws by withholding these credit card fees from tips. Because the employer improperly reduced the tips, the company lost the right to pay the lower "tipped minimum wage" and must instead pay full minimum wage to affected employees.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling protects servers and other tipped employees from having their earnings reduced by employer fees. Employers cannot legally deduct processing costs or other expenses from tips—tips belong fully to employees. If an employer does withhold from tips, they must pay regular minimum wage instead of the reduced tipped rate. This case reinforces that workers' tips are protected earnings under wage laws.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.