Haase v. Cameron Mitchell Restaurants, LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Ohio
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court denied the employer's motion to dismiss the FLSA and state-law wage claims, allowing the plaintiff's complaint to proceed. The plaintiff alleges the employer failed to pay minimum wage for non-tip-producing work performed by servers.
What This Ruling Means
Haase v. Cameron Mitchell Restaurants Case Summary
What Happened
A server at Cameron Mitchell Restaurants filed a wage theft lawsuit claiming the restaurant failed to pay minimum wage for work that didn't generate tips. The server argued that while handling non-tip-producing tasks—like cleaning, restocking, or training—the employer did not compensate her fairly under federal and state wage laws.
What the Court Decided
The court rejected the restaurant's request to throw out the case early. Instead, the judge allowed the wage claims to move forward so the case could proceed to the next stages of litigation. The court found the server's allegations serious enough to warrant a full hearing.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces that servers and tipped employees cannot be paid below minimum wage for all hours worked, even if some tasks don't directly produce tips. Employers must ensure workers receive at least the legal minimum for every hour, regardless of the type of work performed. The decision keeps the door open for servers to challenge unfair pay practices through the courts.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.