KELLY v. J&J SERVICE SOLUTIONS LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Pennsylvania
- Circuit
- Third Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved an FLSA collective action settlement where J&J Service Solutions agreed to pay $505,000 to resolve wage and hour claims of 131 employees who were not paid overtime despite working over 40 hours per week under a day-rate compensation plan.
What This Ruling Means
Kelly v. J&J Service Solutions LLC Settlement Summary
What Happened
Kelly and 130 other employees sued J&J Service Solutions LLC, claiming the company failed to pay them overtime wages. These workers were paid using a day-rate system but often worked more than 40 hours per week without receiving extra pay for the additional hours, as required by federal law.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement requiring J&J Service Solutions to pay $505,000 to compensate the 131 affected employees. This amount covers the unpaid overtime wages the workers were entitled to receive.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that employers cannot use day-rate payment systems to avoid paying overtime. Workers have the right to receive extra pay when working over 40 hours weekly, regardless of how their employer structures their regular wages. The settlement demonstrates that workers can take legal action collectively to recover unpaid wages, and courts will enforce these protections even when multiple employees band together.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.