Etna Properties v. Holladay City
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Civil Rights: Accomodations
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Utah
- Circuit
- Tenth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted summary judgment in favor of Holladay City, dismissing all of plaintiffs' claims. The court found that the requested accommodation to house twelve residents (rather than six) was not necessary under the Fair Housing Act because it was based on financial feasibility of the business model rather than disability-related need.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.