Skip to main content

Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund v. AEI Williams Group Co

W.D. Wash.February 5, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00616
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for an order to show cause and found that AEI Williams Group Co. and its owner/registered agent Elmore W. Williams III violated a court order compelling compliance with a subpoena for document production in an ERISA audit dispute.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Two local unions (Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers) sued construction company AEI Williams Group Co over unpaid contributions to their health and security fund. The unions claimed the company violated ERISA, a federal law that protects employee benefit plans. Construction workers in these unions rely on their employers to make required payments into funds that provide health insurance and other benefits. **What the Court Decided** The court case was filed in 2020, but the final outcome and specific court decision are not available in the public record. No damages amount has been reported, which suggests the case may have been settled privately or is still ongoing. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights an important protection for union workers. When employers fail to pay required contributions to benefit funds, workers can lose access to health insurance and other crucial benefits. ERISA gives unions and benefit funds the legal tools to force employers to make these payments and recover what's owed. For construction workers and other union members, these cases help ensure employers can't simply skip their benefit obligations without consequences.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.