Randall v. Integrated Communication Service Inc
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Washington
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved settlement administrator's motion to conduct additional skip-tracing to locate uncashed settlement checks and distribute remaining unclaimed funds as cy pres payment to National Employment Law Project, a nonprofit aligned with FLSA and wage-hour law objectives.
What This Ruling Means
Randall v. Integrated Communication Service Inc
What Happened
Employees at Integrated Communication Service Inc filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to pay them wages they had earned—a practice known as wage theft. The workers sought compensation for these unpaid wages.
What the Court Decided
The company and employees reached a settlement agreement worth $2,259,017 in damages. The court approved a plan to search for workers who never cashed their settlement checks. For any funds that remain unclaimed after the search effort, the money will go to the National Employment Law Project, a nonprofit organization that works to protect workers' rights under federal wage laws.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that courts take wage theft seriously and will order companies to pay substantial damages when they violate workers' rights. The settlement demonstrates that workers can succeed in holding employers accountable for unpaid wages. Additionally, unclaimed settlement funds being directed to worker advocacy organizations means the money continues supporting efforts to prevent future wage violations and protect employee rights.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.