Skip to main content

Nash v. New York State Department of Labor

N.Y. App. Div.November 2, 2006Cited 256 times
Defendant WinNash
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kane
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court confirmed the Department of Labor's determination that the petitioner, a self-employed electrician, willfully violated prevailing wage laws by paying employees $15.70/hour instead of the required journeyman electrician rate of $25/hour plus benefits on public works projects.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Nash, a self-employed electrician, was found to have underpaid his employees on government construction projects. Instead of paying workers the required rate of $25 per hour plus benefits for journeyman electricians, he only paid them $15.70 per hour. The New York Department of Labor investigated and determined Nash deliberately violated prevailing wage laws, which require contractors on public works projects to pay workers specific minimum rates. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with the Department of Labor and confirmed their findings. The court agreed that Nash willfully broke the law by underpaying his electrician employees nearly $10 per hour below the required rate. Nash had challenged the Department's determination, but the court upheld it. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that employees working on government-funded construction projects have strong legal protections. Prevailing wage laws ensure workers on public projects receive fair compensation that matches local industry standards. When employers violate these laws, workers can file complaints with their state labor department, which has the authority to investigate and enforce proper payment. The case shows that courts will back up labor departments when they find deliberate wage violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.