Skip to main content

R.I., Inc. v. New York State Department of Labor

N.Y. App. Div.April 27, 2010Cited 257 times
Defendant WinR.I., Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court confirmed the Department of Labor's determination that the contractor willfully failed to pay prevailing wages on public work projects and upheld the 25% civil penalty assessment.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** R.I., Inc., a contractor, was accused of not paying proper wages to workers on public construction projects in New York. The state requires contractors working on government-funded projects to pay "prevailing wages" - essentially the standard pay rates for that type of work in the area. The New York State Department of Labor investigated and found that R.I., Inc. deliberately failed to pay these required wage rates to their workers. The company challenged this finding in court. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with the Department of Labor and confirmed that R.I., Inc. had willfully violated wage laws by underpaying workers on public projects. The court also upheld a 25% civil penalty that was imposed on the company as punishment for breaking the law. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that employers cannot shortchange workers on government projects. When contractors bid on public work, they must factor in paying fair wages - they can't boost profits by cutting worker pay. The penalty also sends a message that wage theft has real consequences, helping protect workers from similar violations in the future.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.