Skip to main content

Northwest Administrators Inc v. Harold Smith & Son Inc

W.D. Wash.August 20, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00552
Plaintiff WinHarold Smith & Son Inc.$15,613.33 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Default judgment entered in favor of Northwest Administrators Inc. (as administrative agent for Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund) against Harold Smith & Son Inc. for failure to remit timely pension contributions, awarding liquidated damages, interest, and attorney's fees totaling $15,613.33.

What This Ruling Means

Court Case Summary: Northwest Administrators Inc v. Harold Smith & Son Inc

What Happened

Northwest Administrators, which manages a pension fund for Teamsters union workers, sued Harold Smith & Son Inc. The company had failed to send required pension contributions to the workers' retirement fund on time. These contributions are money employers must set aside for employees' future retirement benefits.

What the Court Decided

The court ruled in favor of Northwest Administrators. Because Harold Smith & Son Inc. did not respond to the lawsuit or provide a defense, the judge entered a default judgment. The court ordered the company to pay $15,613.33, which included the missed pension contributions, additional fees for paying late, interest charges, and attorney's fees.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case reinforces that employers cannot ignore their legal duty to fund workers' pensions. When companies fail to make these payments, workers' retirement security is threatened. The court's decision—and the financial penalties imposed—shows that companies cannot simply avoid their pension obligations without consequences. Workers depend on these contributions for retirement income.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.