Skip to main content

Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund v. Reclaim Company LLC

W.D. Wash.October 8, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00643
Plaintiff WinReclaim Company LLC$580 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Reclaim Company LLC after the defendant failed to appear or defend. The court awarded plaintiffs $580 in attorney fees and costs, and ordered the defendant to produce extensive payroll and employment records for inspection.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Health Fund vs. Construction Company Over Missing Payments** This case involved a dispute between a union health fund and Reclaim Company LLC, a construction company. The International Union of Operating Engineers health fund, representing workers from two local unions (302 and 612), sued the company for allegedly failing to make required payments into the workers' health and security fund. These payments are typically required under union contracts to provide healthcare and other benefits to construction workers. The health fund claimed this violated ERISA, a federal law that protects worker benefit plans. Under union agreements, employers must contribute specific amounts to these funds based on hours worked or wages paid to union employees. While the court outcome isn't specified in the available records, this type of case typically results in employers being ordered to pay the missing contributions plus interest and penalties. **What this means for workers:** Union members depend on employer contributions to their health and benefit funds for medical coverage and retirement security. When employers don't make these required payments, it can jeopardize workers' access to healthcare and other benefits they've earned. This case demonstrates that unions actively monitor and pursue legal action when employers fail to meet their contribution obligations, helping protect workers' benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.