Skip to main content

Board of Trustees of the Locals 302 and 612 of the Intermational Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund v. Fenix Earthworks LLC

W.D. Wash.March 29, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00799
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the Trusts' motion for summary judgment against Fenix Earthworks LLC for failure to pay employer contributions to multiemployer pension and benefit funds as required under ERISA and collective bargaining agreements.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Health Fund Sues Construction Company Over Unpaid Benefits** This case involved a dispute between a union health and security fund representing Operating Engineers (Locals 302 and 612) and Fenix Earthworks LLC, a construction company. The union fund claimed that Fenix failed to make required payments into the health and welfare fund that provides medical benefits and security for union workers. These payments are typically required under collective bargaining agreements and federal law (ERISA - Employee Retirement Income Security Act). The court case was filed in March 2024, but the final outcome is not yet clear from available records. The union alleged that Fenix violated ERISA requirements and breached its obligations to contribute to the worker benefit fund. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights how union benefit funds work to protect workers' health insurance and welfare benefits. When employers fail to make required contributions to these funds, it can jeopardize workers' access to healthcare and other benefits they've earned. Union funds often pursue legal action to ensure employers meet their payment obligations, protecting workers' benefits even when individual employees might not have the resources to fight large companies themselves.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.